From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress |
Date: | 2019-02-15 14:13:48 |
Message-ID: | 422e0383-79e1-7c10-5771-1e232e3349ca@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-02-15 14:32, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> identity ... ok 238 ms
> partition_join ... ok 429 ms
> partition_prune ... ok 786 ms
> reloptions ... ok 94 ms
> hash_part ... ok 78 ms
> indexing ... ok 1298 ms
> partition_aggregate ... ok 727 ms
> partition_info ... ok 110 ms
> test event_trigger ... ok 128 ms
> test fast_default ... ok 173 ms
> test stats ... ok 637 ms
We should also strive to align "FAILED" properly. This is currently
quite unreadable:
int4 ... ok (128 ms)
int8 ... FAILED (153 ms)
oid ... ok (163 ms)
float4 ... ok (231 ms)
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-02-15 14:16:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default? |
Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2019-02-15 14:03:24 | Re: libpq compression |