Re: pgpool question

From: Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)propertykey(dot)com>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgpool question
Date: 2005-03-09 17:23:29
Message-ID: 422F3111.7090504@propertykey.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> I'm experimenting with pgpool 2.51 on my Linux box runnung
> two postgresql backends: pg74:5432 and pg801:5433
>
> I configured pgpool to use pg74:5432 as primary backend and pg801:5433
> as second one. Pgpool is running on default port (9999) and
> I configured my web application to use it, so I could start/stop backends
> without disturbing client (web browser).
>
> When I stop primary backend (pg74:5432) pgpool switched to backend
> failover from (5432) to (5433) done
> but when I start primary and stopped secondary backend pgpool
> never switched back to primary backend as expected ! I see bogus message
> like:
> starting failover from (5433) to (5433)
>
> What I'm doing wrong ?

I don't think anything. I could be wrong, but my understanding is that
if the primary goes down, you have to restart pgpool after primary comes
back up. It doesn't toggle back and forth from primary <-> secondary
when necessary, it only goes primary->secondary. I played with pgpool
for a while and came up with effectively the same confused question.

--
Jeff Hoffmann
jeff(at)propertykey(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2005-03-09 17:27:40 Re: pgpool question
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2005-03-09 17:10:25 pgpool question