From: | Rick Casey <rick(dot)casey(at)colorado(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Rick Schumeyer <rschumeyer(at)ieee(dot)org> |
Cc: | "'PgSql General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgresql vs mysql performance comparison |
Date: | 2005-03-08 17:11:25 |
Message-ID: | 422DDCBD.6090205@colorado.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
This will not answer you question, but documents some of the evidence
for you:
http://www.geocities.com/mailsoftware42/db/
Rick Casey, Research Associate
Institute for Behavioral Genetics
rick(dot)casey(at)colorado(dot)edu
303.735.3518
Rick Schumeyer wrote:
> I’m interested in comparing the performance of postgresql and mysql
>
> on various combinations of user loads and database sizes. I have seen
>
> a few statements to the effect of “mysql is faster for small, low use
>
> applications, but postgresql is better for bigger stuff”. I would like
>
> to run some independent tests to see if this is true.
>
> Before I do this, has anyone done this already, with the latest
>
> versions of both? I think I’ve seen some comparisons that are
>
> somewhat dated.
>
> Does anyone have any pointers on what to do or not do? Or
>
> would anyone be willing to comment on an experiment plan
>
> and suggest improvements? Any help or references are appreciated.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-08 17:16:28 | Re: Move cursor |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-08 17:09:42 | Re: postgresql vs mysql performance comparison |