Re: postgresql vs mysql performance comparison

From: Howard Cole <howard(dot)cole(at)selestial(dot)com>
To: 'PgSql General' <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql vs mysql performance comparison
Date: 2005-03-08 13:20:57
Message-ID: 422DA6B9.7030707@selestial.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

You may want to consider other things...

MySQL adds complexity in that it has several database engines: MyISAM,
InnoDB and MAXDB. All of which have different performance
characteristics. MyISAM is very fast for databases with few
transactions, but InnoDB is more comparable to Postgres in that it
allows superior locking and foreign key integrity etc.

Although not appropriate for a speed comparison, you might want to note
that the use of Mysql versions 4.0 upward now require commercial license
for clients, which are no longer LGPL, whereas Postgres is free (BSD
license). This makes transactions per dollar an interesting statistic
when comparing the Postgres and MySql!

I look forward to seeing the results.

Howard Cole
www.selestial.com

Rick Schumeyer wrote:

> I’m interested in comparing the performance of postgresql and mysql
>
> on various combinations of user loads and database sizes.
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tony 2005-03-08 13:46:30 Re: problem with distinct rows
Previous Message Sim Zacks 2005-03-08 12:36:04 Re: iterate over refcursor