Re: Display Pg buffer cache (WIP)

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Display Pg buffer cache (WIP)
Date: 2005-03-06 08:13:17
Message-ID: 422ABB9D.2050905@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> It'd be possible to dispense with the per-buffer spinlocks so long as
> you look only at the tag (and perhaps the TAG_VALID flag bit). The
> tags can't be changing while you hold the BufMappingLock.

That's what I had thought at first, but this comment in buf_internals.h
dissuaded me: "buf_hdr_lock must be held to examine or change the tag,
flags, usage_count, refcount, or wait_backend_id fields." The comment
already notes this isn't true if you've got the buffer pinned; it would
be worth adding another exception for holding the BufMappingLock, IMHO.

> I'm dubious that there's any point in recording information as
> transient as the refcounts and dirtybits

I think it's worth recording dirty bits -- it provides an indication of
the effectiveness of the bgwriter, for example. Reference counts could
be done away with, although I doubt it would have a significant effect
on the time spent holding the lock.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-03-06 08:49:05 Re: Display Pg buffer cache (WIP)
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2005-03-06 06:50:50 Re: Cleaning up unreferenced table files