| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans |
| Date: | 2005-02-25 17:11:44 |
| Message-ID: | 421F5C50.5070404@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
> I wouldn't mind seeing people be a little more vocal on the hackers list
> about what they plan to be doing, just so that there's not duplication
> of effort. But trying to assemble that into some sort of published
> Master Plan sounds to me like just a recipe for making ourselves look
> foolish when the Plan ends up having little relationship to reality.
The things I would _like_ to do:
* Combine pg_dump and pg_dumpall into a single binary with common
options, allowing a full cluster custom format dump.
* Make psql backwards compatible like pg_dump is
* Work with a few of the IRC guys on a pgsql version of SQL*Loader.
This would be a rad high speed data loader, with overflow files of rows
that couldn't be loaded, etc.
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-02-25 17:21:49 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans |
| Previous Message | Dr. Stephane Schildknecht | 2005-02-25 17:07:36 | Association PostgreSQLFr, statuts et inscription |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-02-25 17:18:26 | Re: Some download statistics |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-25 17:02:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans |