Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans
Date: 2005-02-25 16:09:35
Message-ID: 421F4DBF.7080007@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

> I would agree that since we have a number of commercial developers who
> do have intentions of working on specific items in 8.1, it would be nice
> to list those items somewhere (the urgent section of the TODO seems
> fine), but it is up to those developers to speak up.

I'd like to bundle pg_dump and pg_dumpall into a single binary, allowing
pg_dumpall in custom (binary) format. Dunno if I'll get the time though :)

I'd also like to backport 8.0's pg_dump to 7.4.x since I think it has
'bug fixes'...

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2005-02-25 16:24:50 Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans
Previous Message Robert Treat 2005-02-25 16:06:05 Re: Development Plans

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2005-02-25 16:20:34 Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
Previous Message Robert Treat 2005-02-25 16:06:05 Re: Development Plans