From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question |
Date: | 2005-02-24 14:54:02 |
Message-ID: | 421DEA8A.4050008@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> In the final test, the BIOS decided the disk was giving up and
> reassigned it as 0Mb.. Required two extra cold boots, then it was back
> up to 20Gb. Still no data loss.
I think it would be fun to re-run these tests with MySQL...
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-02-24 15:02:15 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-02-24 14:42:09 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-02-24 15:02:15 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-02-24 14:42:09 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question |