Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question
Date: 2005-02-24 14:54:02
Message-ID: 421DEA8A.4050008@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

> In the final test, the BIOS decided the disk was giving up and
> reassigned it as 0Mb.. Required two extra cold boots, then it was back
> up to 20Gb. Still no data loss.

I think it would be fun to re-run these tests with MySQL...

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-02-24 15:02:15 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-02-24 14:42:09 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-02-24 15:02:15 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-02-24 14:42:09 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question