From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Get rid of system attributes in pg_attribute? |
Date: | 2005-02-22 17:54:38 |
Message-ID: | 421B71DE.8000403@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, that probably knocks out my thought that we could stop reserving
> the system column names (at least ctid and xmin, which are the two that
> actually seem useful to ordinary clients, need to stay reserved). But
> it still seems like we don't have to represent these columns explicitly
> in pg_attribute.
Hm, technically you might be right. Still, I like pgAdmin3 to show that
columns (when "show system objects" is enabled) for teaching purposes,
so users/newbies browsing the objects will learn "hey, there are some
reserved columns, they could have some meaning". I'd be not too excited
about emulating system column pg_attribute entries...
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-22 18:05:47 | Re: Get rid of system attributes in pg_attribute? |
Previous Message | Darcy Buskermolen | 2005-02-22 16:57:30 | Re: psql: recall previous command? |