| From: | Geoffrey KRETZ <gk(at)4js(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PGS 7.2 : Insert with wrong number of values did not |
| Date: | 2005-02-21 16:59:25 |
| Message-ID: | 421A136D.1030702@4js.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 09:49, Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:
>
>
>>Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 09:38, Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I've got a question about a difference beetween PGS 7.2 and PGS 7.4
>>>>behaviours.
>>>>
>>>>With PGS 7.2 :
>>>>INSERT INTO table (col1, col2) VALUES (val1) doesn't fail
>>>>
>>>>With PGS 7.4 :
>>>>INSERT INTO table (col1, col2) VALUES (val1) failed
>>>>
>>>>Is it a known bug ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Yes, if 7.2 did that it WAS a known bug. Fixed in 7.4. It is illegal
>>>to have unmatching numbers of columns in the insert list and the column
>>>list.
>>>
>>>Did 7.2 really do that?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>7.1 do that and while testing recently, we found that in 7.2, it's the
>>same behaviour. In 7.3, it's already ok.
>>
>>I've answer the question just to be sure that it's a postgresql bug.
>>
>>
>
>
>Note that in the old version, postgresql would have inserted a default
>value or a NULL if there was no default. With the addition of the
>DEFAULT keyword, you can get the same basic effect with:
>
>insert into table (col1, col2) values (val1,DEFAULT);
>
>
I've read a thread about that, but I wasn't sure about the PostgreSQL's
version where the change was made.
Thx for your answers !
Geoffrey KRETZ
Four J's Development Tools
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Edmund Bacon | 2005-02-21 17:17:17 | Re: error while loading shared libraries: libpq.so.3 |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-02-21 16:55:13 | Re: PGS 7.2 : Insert with wrong number of values did not |