From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | JM <jerome(at)gmanmi(dot)tv> |
Subject: | Re: Effects of IDLE processes |
Date: | 2005-02-21 00:50:18 |
Message-ID: | 4219304A.1070408@bigfoot.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
JM wrote:
> Hi ALL,
>
> I was wondering if there is a DB performance reduction if there are a lot of
> IDLE processes.
>
> 30786 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 32504 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 32596 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 1722 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 1724 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 3881 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 6332 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 6678 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 6700 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 6768 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 8544 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 8873 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 8986 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 9000 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 9010 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 9013 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 9016 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 9019 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 9020 ? S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
>
In my experience not at all, you have to wonder if some of that are "idle in transaction"
that are really a pain in the @#$
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Klint Gore | 2005-02-21 01:30:21 | Re: bad performances using hashjoin |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2005-02-21 00:45:03 | Re: bad performances using hashjoin |