| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around |
| Date: | 2005-02-20 20:05:09 |
| Message-ID: | 4218ED75.1060408@coretech.co.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> The question is whether we are willing to back-patch a fairly large
> amount of not-very-well-tested code into 8.0. See
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-02/msg00123.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-02/msg00127.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-02/msg00131.php
>
> I personally don't think it's worth the risk. The code works well
> enough to commit to development tip, but it's fundamentally alpha
> quality code.
I think this makes the most sense. If we are going to do an extended
testing period for 8.0.without-arc then bundling it in there might worth
considering.
regards
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2005-02-20 20:30:41 | Re: Query optimizer 8.0.1 (and 8.0) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-02-20 19:36:43 | Re: Query optimizer 8.0.1 (and 8.0) |