| From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL scaleability question |
| Date: | 2005-02-19 16:40:35 |
| Message-ID: | 42176C03.1050502@zeut.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Christopher Browne wrote:
>Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when mary(dot)y(dot)wang(at)boeing(dot)com ("Wang, Mary Y") would write:
>
>
>>I have been using PostgreSQL for my project repository, because it
>>is free and easy to use. My manager is trying to decide if he
>>should use a commerical database such as Oracle or PostgreSQL for a
>>gaint information repository for the corporate. He asked me what is
>>the scaleability on PostgreSQL. I don't have the answer. So far, I
>>have been very pleased with PostgreSQL, but I'm only using it for my
>>project.
>>
>>Does anyone have any information on this? Has anyone done any
>>comparsions?
>>
>>
>
>It is very difficult to evaluate such things absent of actually doing
>simulations of the kind of load you intend to put on your systems.
>
That said, there are lots of people running extremely large data
repositories with PostgreSQL, if you search the archives you can
probably find some examples.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | charlie clark | 2005-02-19 17:04:32 | How do I change sort order behavious with nulls |
| Previous Message | Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh | 2005-02-19 16:27:57 | Re: I'm newbie |