From: | Greg Spiegelberg <gspiegelberg(at)cranel(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: OID assistance |
Date: | 2005-02-18 14:49:37 |
Message-ID: | 42160081.5050205@cranel.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Spiegelberg, Greg" <gspiegelberg(at)cranel(dot)com> writes:
>
>>It's come to our attention that in 14-16 days our OID's will wrap around and
>>we need some advice.
>
>
> Are you actually using the OIDs for anything? If not, don't worry about
> it.
We use OID's to store files in the database. Does that qualify?
> Unless you are actually depending on OIDs to be unique in some of your
> user tables, wraparound shouldn't matter. The only possible bad
> consequence is that you might once in a while get a collision in the
> system tables (eg, a CREATE TABLE fails because the OID generated for
> the table conflicts with an existing table). The odds of that are small
> enough that it's probably not going to be as much of a problem as a
> dump/reload would be. Just retry the transaction and it'll usually
> work the next time.
Retrying the transaction isn't something we want to worry about. Our
code doesn't have that capability built into it.
I read a mailing list article from a while back and there was mentioned in
it the possibility of OID's becoming a INT8. Does this exist in any of the
new versions?
Greg
--
Greg Spiegelberg
Product Development Manager
Cranel, Incorporated.
Phone: 614.318.4314
Fax: 614.431.8388
Email: gspiegelberg(at)cranel(dot)com
Technology. Integrity. Focus.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-18 15:02:36 | Re: OID assistance |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-18 14:48:46 | Re: OID assistance |