Re: win32 performance - fsync question

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: win32 performance - fsync question
Date: 2005-02-18 10:33:56
Message-ID: 4215C494.7030506@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Portability, or rather the complete lack of it. Stuff that isn't in the
> Single Unix Spec is a hard sell.

O_DIRECT is reasonably common among modern Unixen (it is supported by
Linux, FreeBSD, and probably a couple of the commercial variants like
AIX or IRIX); it should also be reasonably easy to check for support at
configure time. It's on my TODO list to take a gander at adding support
for O_DIRECT for WAL, I just haven't gotten around to it yet.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Russell Smith 2005-02-18 11:00:53 Re: Help me recovering data
Previous Message Jürgen Cappel 2005-02-18 09:53:32 Re: Help me recovering data