| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Ian Turner <vectro(at)pipeline(dot)com>, Martin Christensen <knightsofspamalot-factotum(at)mail1(dot)stofanet(dot)dk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2000-10-15 04:21:42 |
| Message-ID: | 4214.971583702@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Now that you mention it, though, doesn't TOAST break heapam's assumption
>>>> that char(n) is fixed length? Seems like we'd better either remove that
>>>> assumption or mark char(n) nontoastable. Any opinions which is better?
> I don't see any more communication on this in my mail archives.
Nothing's been done yet, but we *must* fix this before 7.1.
I'm wondering whether it's worthwhile keeping the VARLENA_FIXED_SIZE
macro at all. Is there any potential use for it?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2000-10-15 06:16:01 | Re: RI violated, bug or feature? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-15 03:33:42 | Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL |