Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1
Date: 2023-02-27 20:46:32
Message-ID: 421385.1677530792@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2023-02-27 12:42:00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I went ahead and coded it that way, and it doesn't look too awful.
>> Any objections?

> Looks good to me.

> I think it'd be an indication of a bug around the invalidation handling if the
> terminations were required. So even leaving other things aside, I prefer this
> version.

Sounds good. I'll work on getting this back-patched.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-02-27 21:13:59 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2023-02-27 20:43:08 Re: Auth extensions, with an LDAP/SCRAM example [was: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks]