From: | Michael Klatt <lists(dot)tcimk(at)olympus(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: replication |
Date: | 2005-02-14 17:40:10 |
Message-ID: | 4210E27A.60203@olympus.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Christopher Browne wrote:
> The world rejoiced as fred(dot)blaise(at)excilan(dot)com (Fred Blaise) wrote:
>
>>Hello
>>
>>I am running postgres 7.4.6 on 2 BSDi boxes. One is live, the other one
>>is a failover. I would like to implement a master-slave replication
>>process.
>>
>>I believe replication has been included in the base package since 7.3.x.
>>
>>Do you have any good pointers/how-to to direct me to?
>
>
> For such cases, I believe that Slony-I is the preferred solution these
> days. The comprehensive documentation may be found in CVS at gborg;
> it may be found online at the URL below.
Hi Christopher,
I've taken a look at Slony-I and found some limitations. Unless I'm
mistaken, Slony-I can't be used to replicate users/groups, and it must
be set up for each individual database. So, for a server where users
and databases are added and removed often, then it seems like Slony-I
may not be the best choice. For simply replicating data in a limited
number of databases, then Slony-I probably performs much better than
pgpool (which has many issues of its own).
We're considering using Slony-I for some applications (where performance
is an issue and user/databases don't change often) and pgpool for others
(where we just need everything replicated).
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-02-14 18:26:48 | Re: replication |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-14 17:14:33 | Re: Problem binding postmaster to several interfaces |