From: | Markus Schaber <schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Performance List <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostGIS Users Discussion <postgis-users(at)postgis(dot)refractions(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Bad query optimizer misestimation because of TOAST |
Date: | 2005-02-07 14:07:44 |
Message-ID: | 42077630.5020802@logi-track.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Tom,
Tom Lane schrieb:
> Markus Schaber <schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com> writes:
>> [Query optimizer misestimation using lossy GIST on TOASTed columns]
>
> What I would be inclined to do is to extend ANALYZE to make an estimate
> of the extent of toasting of every toastable column, and then modify
> cost_qual_eval to charge a nonzero cost for evaluation of Vars that are
> potentially toasted.
What to do now? To fix this issue seems to be a rather long-term job.
Is it enough to document workarounds (as in PostGIS), provided that
there are such workarounds for other GIST users?
Is there a bug tracking system we could file the problem, so it does not
get lost?
Markus
--
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com | www.logi-track.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Schaber | 2005-02-07 14:39:15 | Re: Can the V7.3 EXPLAIN ANALYZE be trusted? |
Previous Message | Antony Paul | 2005-02-07 11:58:14 | Re: Index not used with or condition |