Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, kaplan(dot)valeria(at)gmail(dot)com, davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks, gunnar(dot)bluth(at)pro-open(dot)de, kmcmi046(at)uottawa(dot)ca, guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info, chris(at)1006(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification
Date: 2023-06-07 23:09:36
Message-ID: 420735c2-f718-17fe-6f0c-96f969a20bcb@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 6/7/23 13:48, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 8:35 PM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>

> ANother question was about who oversees the process, probably about
> the organization of all this.

That is the main question. Without an organization in place the rest of
it is wasted effort.

>
> Basically what we need is some guidance about all of it ;)
>

Who is we?

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2023-06-08 05:24:44 Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2023-06-07 20:48:53 Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification