Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]

From: Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Subject: Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
Date: 2015-01-02 06:17:24
Message-ID: 4205E661176A124FAF891E0A6BA913526639A38A@szxeml509-mbs.china.huawei.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 31 December 2014 18:36, Amit Kapila Wrote,

>The patch looks good to me. I have done couple of
>cosmetic changes (spelling mistakes, improve some comments,
>etc.), check the same once and if you are okay, we can move
>ahead.

Thanks for review and changes, changes looks fine to me..

Regards,
Dilip

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-01-02 07:17:39 Problems with approach #2 to value locking (INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE patch)
Previous Message Noah Misch 2015-01-02 04:04:44 Re: orangutan seizes up during isolation-check