From: | Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |
Date: | 2013-11-08 04:12:38 |
Message-ID: | 4205E661176A124FAF891E0A6BA9135265924763@SZXEML507-MBS.china.huawei.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08 November 2013 03:22, Euler Taveira Wrote
> On 07-11-2013 09:42, Dilip kumar wrote:
>
> Dilip, this is on my TODO for 9.4. I've already had a half-backed patch
> for it. Let's see what I can come up with.
Ok, Let me know if I can contribute to this..
> > Is it required to move the common code for parallel operation of
> pg_dump and vacuumdb to one place and reuse it ?
> >
> I'm not sure about that because the pg_dump parallel code is tight to
> TOC entry. Also, dependency matters for pg_dump while in the scripts
> case, an order to be choosen will be used. However, vacuumdb can share
> the parallel code with clusterdb and reindexdb (my patch does it).
+1
>
> Of course, a refactor to unify parallel code (pg_dump and scripts) can
> be done in a separate patch.
>
> > Prototype patch is attached in the mail, please provide your
> feedback/Suggestions...
> >
> I'll try to merge your patch with the one I have here until the next CF.
Regards,
Dilip
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-11-08 04:16:53 | Re: TODO: Split out pg_resetxlog output into pre- and post-sections |
Previous Message | Harold Giménez | 2013-11-08 03:41:12 | Re: Changing pg_dump default file format |