| From: | Paul Tillotson <pntil(at)shentel(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Applications that leak connections |
| Date: | 2005-02-05 00:20:59 |
| Message-ID: | 4204116B.4050208@shentel.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't the postmaster notice that
something killed a backend and cause all the other ones to roll back?
Paul Tillotson
Neil Conway wrote:
> Paul Tillotson wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know a safe way to shutdown just one backend
>
>
> Sending it a SIGTERM via kill(1) should be safe.
>
> -Neil
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Wilson | 2005-02-05 01:34:39 | Re: Safely Killing Backends (Was: Applications that leak connections) |
| Previous Message | phil campaigne | 2005-02-04 23:51:37 | Re: Duration between two timestamps |