Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache

From: Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache
Date: 2022-09-29 06:11:30
Message-ID: 41e084df-f117-4161-bf7f-08d434cf5d75@Spark
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Sep 28, 2022, 23:20 +0800, Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems like the commit a448e49bcbe40fb72e1ed85af910dd216d45bad8 reverts the changes on pg_buffercache.
>
> > Why compute usagecount_avg twice?
> Then, I'm going back to v11 + the fix for this.
>
> Thanks,
> Melih
Looks good to me.

Regards,
Zhang Mingli

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-09-29 06:12:20 Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2022-09-29 06:02:32 Re: Use pg_pwritev_with_retry() instead of write() in dir_open_for_write() to avoid partial writes?