| From: | Dennis Sacks <dennis(at)illusions(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sam Adams <samadams(at)myfastmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BLOBs vs BYTEA |
| Date: | 2005-02-01 03:51:06 |
| Message-ID: | 41FEFCAA.5070603@illusions.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Sam Adams wrote:
>Anyway, I was wondering which would be a better way to store a large
>amount of files each a few megabytes in size. There could be hundreds of
>thousands of files altogether. If stored as BYTEAs this would put them
>all in a single table. Would this effect performance considerablely? I
>assume if there were thousands then it would. But if the data is stored
>as BLOBs then aren't they store inside the database just in another
>table? Wouldn't this also be undesirable. Would it be better to store
>them normally on the file system and just provide the path and file name
>in the database. Obviously this wont provide any security or backup but
>would it make sense to do it this way with such a large amount of data?
>
>
This is one of those age old debates. I've done both, and I'll tell you
that in my experience it is less of a headache to store the files in the
filesystem (which is what filesystems are designed for) and store the
metadata in the database.
Dennis Sacks
dennis(at)illusions(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John DeSoi | 2005-02-01 04:42:57 | Re: error in function!! |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-01 03:37:05 | Re: plpgsql functions and NULLs |