From: | Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Firebird, MySQL rules according to Evans |
Date: | 2005-01-21 07:19:52 |
Message-ID: | 41F0AD18.5070807@travelamericas.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
I can believe those numbers if I carefully read the description of what
they are measuring.
MySQL may be popular for small web developments, but is not as popular
for real line of business tools as the other databases, IME, for obvious
reasons. I would also expect PostgreSQL to do better now with the
Windows port.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Michael Paesold wrote:
> Robert Bernier wrote
>
>> Sorry, I just don't believe the numbers. Just google these words and
>> look at the hits returned:
>> mysql: 42,700,000
>> oracle:34,000,000
>> firebird:3,400,000
>> postgresql: 8,650,000
>
>
> Well, don't forget, that mozilla firefox was a long time also called
> firebird. If you add "sql" to all that searches, look at the result
> now (FWIW) ;-)
>
> mysql sql: 8,490,000
> oracle sql: 8,330,000
> firebird sql: 365,000
> postgresql sql: 2.740,000
> db2 sql: 2,000,000
> interbase sql: 397,000
>
> Firebird is now way behind.
>
> Best Regards,
> Michael Paesold
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2005-01-21 07:24:05 | Re: Comparisons |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-01-21 04:40:42 | Re: Nice Fujitsu white papers |