| From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Randolf Richardson <rr(at)8x(dot)ca> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Date: | 2005-01-20 18:03:17 |
| Message-ID: | 41EFF265.40902@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Randolf Richardson wrote:
>> While this doesn't exactly answer your question, I use this little
>> tidbit of information when "selling" people on PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL
>> was chosen over Oracle as the database to handle all of the .org TLDs
>> information. ...
>
> Do you have a link for that information? I've told a few people about
> this and one PostgreSQL advocate (thanks to me -- they were going to be a
> Microsoft shop before that) is asking.
Of course you could read their application when they were competing
with a bunch of other companies using databases from different vendors.
I believe this is the link to their response to the database
questions...
http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/questions-to-applicants-13.htm#Response13TheInternetSocietyISOC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Spiegelberg, Greg | 2005-01-20 18:04:02 | Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance??? |
| Previous Message | Darcy Buskermolen | 2005-01-20 17:33:42 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |