Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Steve Wampler <swampler(at)noao(dot)edu>
Cc: Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date: 2005-01-20 15:57:43
Message-ID: 41EFD4F7.1040900@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> Probably by carefully partitioning their data. I can't imagine anything
> being fast on a single table in 250,000,000 tuple range. Nor can I
> really imagine any database that efficiently splits a single table
> across multiple machines (or even inefficiently unless some internal
> partitioning is being done).

Ah, what about partial indexes - those might help. As a kind of
'semi-partition'.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-01-20 16:00:16 Re: Which PARAMETER is most important for load query??
Previous Message amrit 2005-01-20 15:45:05 Which PARAMETER is most important for load query??