| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ext3 |
| Date: | 2005-01-18 00:54:45 |
| Message-ID: | 41EC5E55.9040006@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
David Garamond wrote:
> Tzahi Fadida wrote:
>
>> I recommend you don't use ext3 for any database:
>> http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/0641.html
>>
>> apparently its still buggy.
>
>
> So what is the recommended fs under Linux? I don't need the best
> speed/throughput, but I prefer not to use ext2 due to long fsck time.
> I also tend to avoid reiser3, it has given us many griefs in the past.
> XFS?
We have had success with XFS and JFS. XFS seems a little better supported.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> Regards,
> dave
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 285 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Frank D. Engel, Jr. | 2005-01-18 01:12:54 | Re: ext3 |
| Previous Message | Rich Shepard | 2005-01-18 00:52:11 | Re: ext3 |