From: | Bo Lorentsen <bl(at)netgroup(dot)dk> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Index optimization ? |
Date: | 2005-01-15 22:20:04 |
Message-ID: | 41E99714.3050607@netgroup.dk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
>This is not legally optimizable into an indexscan, because currval() is
>a volatile function. (It's easy to construct cases where its value
>actually does change from row to row --- just use a nextval() as well.)
>
>
I am not sure what you mean by a "volatile function", and how this
affect the returned types, I guess this demands some more low level PG
knowledge to understand.
>You can fake it out in a couple of ways --- the recommended method is to
>wrap currval in a user-defined function that is misleadingly marked
>stable. I think it still works to just put the call in a sub-select:
> select * from sale where id = (select currval( 'sale_id_seq' ));
>
>
>but I take no responsibility if future improvements in the planner break
>that trick.
>
>
The select trick works just fine, but I don't understand why :-(
Do you have any idea to how I may learn more about function types, or is
this a "read the source, luke" thing (I am not sure I have time for that
right now) ?
Well, thanks anyway ... this just work so nice, and I a looking forward
to fill up this database with plenty of data, and still being able to
sleep :-)
/BL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-01-15 22:24:21 | Re: Multi-column indexes |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-15 22:06:47 | Re: OID Usage |