| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Date: | 2005-01-13 06:51:24 |
| Message-ID: | 41E61A6C.4020203@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> Don't forget your support contract cost, as well as licenses for each
> of your servers: development, testing, QA, etc.
>
> Is it really as "cheap" as 5K? I've heard that for any fairly modern
> system, it's much more, but that may be wrong.
>
Sort of -- see:
http://oraclestore.oracle.com/OA_HTML/ibeCCtpSctDspRte.jsp?section=15105
"It is available on single server systems supporting up to a maximum
of 2 CPUs"
Also note that most industrial strength features (like table
partitioning, RAC, OLAP, Enterprise Manager plugins, etc, etc) are high
priced options (mostly $10K to $20K per CPU) and they can only be used
with the Enterprise edition (which is $40K/CPU *not* $2.5K/CPU).
http://oraclestore.oracle.com/OA_HTML/ibeCCtpSctDspRte.jsp?section=10103
And you are correct, they expect to be paid for each dev, test, and QA
machine too.
The $5K edition is just there to get you hooked ;-) By the time you add
up what you really want/need, figure you'll spend a couple of orders of
magnatude higher, and then > 20% per year for ongoing
maintenance/upgrades/support.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hasnul Fadhly bin Hasan | 2005-01-13 08:34:28 | Performance delay |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-13 02:39:33 | Re: Postgres Optimizer is not smart enough? |