Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft

From: Gary Doades <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date: 2005-01-11 18:02:21
Message-ID: 41E414AD.5020702@gpdnet.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Dave Cramer wrote:
> I understand that but I have seen VM's crash.
>
> This does bring up another point. Since postgresql is not threaded a
> .NET pl would require a separate VM for each connection (unless you can
> share the vm ?). One of the java pl's (pl-j) for postgres has dealt
> with this issue.
> For a hundred connections that's a hundred .NET vm's or java vm's.
>
> Is the .NET VM shareable ?
>
In Windows, most certainly. Not sure about mono.

Cheers,
Gary.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian Fowler 2005-01-11 18:05:04 Assimilation of these "versus" and hardware threads
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-01-11 16:01:00 Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?