From: | Jean-Christophe Arnu <jx(at)tuxfarm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Francois Suter <dba(at)paragraf(dot)ch> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Technical question for a journalist |
Date: | 2005-01-07 17:09:48 |
Message-ID: | 41DEC25C.9040104@tuxfarm.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Francois Suter m'expliquait (le 07.01.2005 16:41):
> Hi list,
>
> No need to send out the press release :-), I was alreday grilled half
> an hour by a French journalist about v8. He had apparently read an
> interview of Marc Fournier somewhere.
>
> Anyway, the journalist had a question about tablespaces. I told him it
> enabled clustering on individual disks or arrays of disks. The
> journalist then said that this seemed like a rather basic feature and
> was surprised that PostgreSQL wasn't already able to do that in the
> previous versions. Is that indeed the case or was there another
> clustering mechanism before?
>
Hi François,
I think it was(is) possible by linking (file system link) different
filenodes on different arrays/disks. This was a manual method and
difficult (or at least not possible with only the official PG utilities)
to dump/restore the spreadness of tables along the disks. This is quite
laborious to implement as you need to scriptshell this (dump/restore).
So to be clear, it was technically possible, but not included really as
a out-of-the-package (out of the box) PG feature.
That's only a heard/though of. Maybe there are other ways to do such
a thing?
--
Jean-Christophe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Christophe Arnu | 2005-01-07 17:38:51 | Re: Technical question for a journalist |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-01-07 17:05:56 | Re: Technical question for a journalist |