From: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |
Date: | 2005-01-07 09:59:58 |
Message-ID: | 41DE5D9E.6010907@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Ned,
>
>
>>That reminds me of another, related question ... can anyone comment on the
>>relationship between MySQL 5 and MaxDB (formerly SAP DB)? The talk at one
>>point was that the end result of that alliance would be a total rewrite of
>>MySQL to incorporate concepts from MaxDB, and that the new product would
>>somehow be backward compatible with both predecessors.
>
>
> That was the idea, yes. Personally, I don't think it's possible; that's
> probably the reason why MySQL 5.0 is two years late. I think eventually
> MySQL AB will have to come to terms with the idea that they have two seperate
> products, MySQL and MaxDB, and the two can't be made compatible.
>
Absolutely. I personally still hope that adopting MAX DB is their
biggest fault.
Please take some time and look at the MAX DB sources - it is the most
ugly thing I have ever seen in my live.
Hans
--
Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria
Tel: +43/660/816 40 77
www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Christophe Arnu | 2005-01-07 10:08:43 | Re: Solutions Linux 2005 Feb 1,2,3 Paris |
Previous Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2005-01-07 09:57:34 | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |