Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..
Date: 2005-01-06 20:21:19
Message-ID: 41DD9DBF.8040501@commandprompt.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Greg Stark wrote:
> Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org> writes:
>
>
>> Now that's rich. I don't think I've ever seen a database perform
>> worse after it was normalized. In fact, I can't even think of a
>> situation where it could!
>
>
> Just remember. All generalisations are false.

In general, I would agree.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP.
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 640 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Poe 2005-01-07 18:48:52 Re: Does "HYPERTHREADING" do any harm if we use with RH9.0
Previous Message Greg Stark 2005-01-06 19:47:22 Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..