From: | Vinicius Caldeira Carvalho <vinicius(dot)carvalho(at)squadra(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: first postgrreSQL tunning |
Date: | 2005-01-06 13:46:37 |
Message-ID: | 41DD413D.6000009@squadra.com.br |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>Hi there! I'm doing my first tunning on my postgreSQL, my server is
>>
>>
>for
>
>
>>a small app, largest table shall never exceed 10k rows, and less than
>>
>>
>1k
>
>
>>transactions/day. So I don't think I should run out of resources. The
>>machine is a Fedora Core 3.0 with 1gb ran and kernel 2.6. I'm thinking
>>in having 50 connections limit, so besides semaphores should I do
>>anything special on kernel parameters. The app is so small that during
>>late night time almost no one will access so, I'm thinking in full
>>vacuuming it every day at 1:00AM.
>>
>>
>
>The biggest danger with small databases is it's easy to become
>overconfident...writing poor queries and such and not properly indexing.
>50 users can hit your system pretty hard if they all decide to do
>something at once. Aside from that, just remember to bump up work_mem a
>bit for fast joining.
>
>Your application may be small, but if it is written well and works, it
>well inevitably become larger and more complex, so plan for the future
>:)
>
>Merlin
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
>
>
Thanks Merlin, besides what I said of tunning anything else I should
care looking at?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ben Bostow | 2005-01-06 13:57:38 | Re: Problems with high traffic |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-01-06 13:34:23 | Re: first postgrreSQL tunning |