| From: | Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bugs in comment moderation scripts |
| Date: | 2004-12-24 16:42:08 |
| Message-ID: | 41CC46E0.9030207@deefs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Alexey Borzov wrote:
> No, there's no step missing, I expected someone to put a "canned" answer
> in this place.
Ok, that makes sense.
> I don't think it's worth the effort to write an explanation for every
> spam piece added via our comment interface. The better approach would be
> to add a prominent warning to comment form and send a "you violated our
> comment guidelines"-type email on comment rejection.
Well, we do have the delete/reject distinction, where delete just
removes the message without sending an E-Mail, and reject provides an
explanation.
Is it worth making that message customizable, given that?
Steve
--
Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>
http://www.deefs.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-12-24 19:13:15 | Re: Bugs in comment moderation scripts |
| Previous Message | Alexey Borzov | 2004-12-24 16:36:35 | Re: Bugs in comment moderation scripts |