From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> |
Cc: | Alex <alex(at)meerkatsoft(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Some Performance Advice Needed |
Date: | 2004-12-23 21:27:12 |
Message-ID: | 41CB3830.2090201@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Jeff wrote:
>
> On Dec 23, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Alex wrote:
>
>
>> Running hdparm reported
>> A) 920mb/s (SCSI 10k)
>> B) 270mb/s (SCSI 10k)
>> C) 1750mb/s (IDE 7.2k)
>
>
>
> IDE disks lie about write completion (This can be disabled on some
> drives) whereas SCSI drives wait for the data to actually be written
> before they report success. It is quite
> easy to corrupt a PG (Or most any db really) on an IDE drive. Check
> the archives for more info.
Do we have any real info on this? Specifically which drives? Is SATA the
same way? What about SATA-II?
I am not saying it isn't true (I know it is) but this is a blanket
statement that may or may not be
true with newer tech.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> --
> Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
> http://www.jefftrout.com/
> http://www.stuarthamm.net/
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 285 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | William Yu | 2004-12-23 21:45:57 | Re: Some Performance Advice Needed |
Previous Message | William Yu | 2004-12-23 20:49:09 | Re: Some Performance Advice Needed |