Re: solaris 10 with gcc 3.3.2

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Belbin, Peter" <PBelbin(at)McLeodUSA(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: solaris 10 with gcc 3.3.2
Date: 2004-12-18 11:03:05
Message-ID: 41C40E69.2010303@mascari.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Mike Mascari wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> I wrote:
>>
>>
>>> This is standard practice for gcc: it tries to use "cleaned up"
>>> versions
>>> of system headers that will not elicit useless warnings from gcc. It's
>>> a good idea, actually, because the degree of insanity in
>>> vendor-supplied
>>> system headers is pretty depressing. But if the gcc install process
>>> generated an invalid "cleanup" file then you need to take that up with
>>> the gcc boys, not us.
>>>
>>
>>
>> On rereading this, a nearly-dead neuron fired --- I have seen problems
>> of this sort arise when someone took a gcc installation generated on
>> NiftyVendorUnix M.N and copied it verbatim to NiftyVendorUnix M.N+1,
>> or indeed any release other than M.N.
>>
> That nearly-dead neuron has value. The problem is that most people are
> getting the Solaris 10 beta builds whose headers conflict with the gcc
> 3.3.2 package's 'adapted' headers they are acquiring from
> sunfreeware.com, which, along with distributing other binary packages,
> is the place referred to by gcc.gnu.org for pre-built Solaris
> binaries. All the original poster needs to do is rebuild the gcc's
> 'adapted' headers with:
>
> # cd /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.3.2/install-tools
> # ./mkheaders
>
> and they should be good to go....

Actually, I see the original poster is on SPARC, so the correct path to
the 'mkheaders' utility is probably going to be:

# cd /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/3.3.2/install-tools
# ./mkheaders

Mike Mascari

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roland Volkmann 2004-12-18 13:22:24 Re: Problem with Upper/Lower Function
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2004-12-18 10:57:55 Re: solaris 10 with gcc 3.3.2