Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It's too bad the buildfarm reports don't show more details about what
>>>CVS pull they're using exactly.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Snapshot is the UTC time at which the cvs pull was done.
>>
>>
>
>That's good but it's of limited use to me, since the snaps are (I
>presume) against the anonymous-CVS server which lags commits on the
>master by I'm-not-sure-how-much.
>
>

In my case it's against my local CVSup mirror, which is updated every 15
minutes. The buildfarm config lets you choose what repo to use.

Nevertheless I take your point.

>
>
>>Clients report
>>what files have changed since the last run, and also, in the case of a
>>failure, what files have changed since the last successful run.
>>
>>
>
>Cool, I had not seen it do that before. If we could get the CVS version
>number of each mentioned file into that, it would go a long way towards
>helping identify exactly what's being tested.
>
>

Feature request filed on pgfoundry - not sure when I'll get to it.

cheers

andrew