Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql

Woodchuck Bill wrote:
> David Harmon <source(at)netcom(dot)com> wrote in
> news:41c44692(dot)42645781(at)news(dot)west(dot)earthlink(dot)net:
>
>
>>On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:29:40 +0000 (UTC) in news.groups, Marc G.
>>Fournier From: <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote,
>>
>>>The pgsql.* hierarchy is a not a private one, it is a public one
>>>carried by several of the large usenet servers.
>>
>>What are the rules for creating new groups in pgsgl.*?
>>

I believe that is something that would be discussed amongst the
community but at this point it probably points to, "if there is
a mailing list, there is a corresponding pgsql.* group."

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>>
>
>
> Fiat-only by Marc. ;-)
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP.
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL