From: | Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Alternatives to Dell? |
Date: | 2004-12-01 22:38:49 |
Message-ID: | 41AE47F9.7010802@3times25.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> A lot of people have been having a devilish time with Dell hardware
> lately. It seems like the quality control just isn't there on the
> Dell servers.
>
> Thing is, some companies are required to use 1st-tier or at least
> 2nd-tier vendors for hardware; they won't home-build. For those
> people, what vendors do others on this list recommend? What have
> been your good/bad experiences?
My experience with Dell is they are not reliable as well.
Half way between the big guys and home built. I've had good success
with Monarch Computers. They've had ads in Linux Journal for a while
and a couple of their boxes have been reviewed there. As a matter of
fact, in the December issue, they did a review of a dual operton from
Monarch.
http://www.monarchcomputer.com/
--
Until later, Geoffrey
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Frank Wiles | 2004-12-01 22:41:30 | Re: Alternatives to Dell? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-01 22:25:03 | Re: Alternatives to Dell? |