Re: Using "LIMIT" is much faster even though, searching

From: "Hyun-Sung, Jang" <siche(at)siche(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using "LIMIT" is much faster even though, searching
Date: 2004-12-01 04:38:40
Message-ID: 41AD4AD0.908@siche.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

before test, I already executed VACUUM FULL.
this result show up after vacuum full.

Tom Lane 쓴 글:

>=?UTF-8?B?7J6l7ZiE7ISx?= <siche(at)siche(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>but, sequence scan, as you see above result, there is big time
>>difference between using LIMIT and without using it.
>>
>>
>
>You've got a table full of dead rows. Try VACUUM FULL ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-12-01 05:03:51 Re: Using "LIMIT" is much faster even though, searching
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-12-01 04:26:11 Re: Using "LIMIT" is much faster even though, searching with PK.