From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Michael Meskes <michael(at)fam-meskes(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Test database for new installs? |
Date: | 2004-11-19 18:27:01 |
Message-ID: | 419E3AF5.20604@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Andrew,
>
>
>>>I can't get too excited about this, to be honest. What I would like to
>>>see, either in contrib or on pgfoundry, is one or more moderately
>>>complete and well populated sample databases.
>>
>>How about the tpcw database model, filled with some real world data
>>(e.g. pgsql books)? Other proposals? I could spend some minutes on that.
>
>
> Hmmm ... sounds like an add-in project. I'm not sure, I think something
> which demonstrates more general principles than the TPC-W database would be
> useful, sort of a "training database".
I didn't mean to supply the optimal training database with tpc-w; at
least, it's not ill-designed, and uses some FKs. Better than what we
have now.
> Maybe one of the writers of PGSQL books has such a thing? Maybe Bruce?
Maybe Michael? Or other OS projects using pgsql? Unfortunately, I only
know projects (groupware) which use pgsql with ill-designed db schemas.
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-11-19 18:54:04 | Re: Test database for new installs? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-11-19 18:00:24 | Re: Test database for new installs? |