| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
| Date: | 2004-11-13 17:06:44 |
| Message-ID: | 41963F24.1060606@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
>
> It is never the fault of a programming language per se. People with a
> good understanding of object design will write "object oriented code"
> in every language, even assembler. People who just don't know what
> they are doing will write bad code, and the best Pascal compiler in
> the world won't be able to prevent that.
Yes but I believe even you would agree that their are programming
languages that are better for certain tasks than others. The use of java
as a replication engine for PostgreSQL seems, well... incorrect.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> Jan
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 285 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-11-13 17:45:50 | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-11-13 15:11:12 | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |