| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for Recover mode in pg_ctl (in 8.0) |
| Date: | 2004-11-07 01:03:14 |
| Message-ID: | 418D7452.3040102@coretech.co.nz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I was thinking that even mildly experienced folks could benefit from a
helpful sanity check. Typically the need to recover a system never comes
at a good time, and features that help prevent silly mistakes are a
great stress saver.
As an aside, while testing recovery during pre beta, I think I probably
"forgot" to put in a recovery.conf about 1 time in 10. Now I was using a
small database cluster tar'ed up in /tmp, so no big deal, but if it had
been a 100G beast that had to come off tape ....
regards
Mark
Tom Lane wrote:
>
>I can't get very excited about this approach, because it only protects
>those people who (a) use pg_ctl to start the postmaster (not everyone)
>and (b) carefully follow the recovery directions (which the people you
>are worried about are very bad at, by hypothesis).
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Reini Urban | 2004-11-07 08:20:57 | Re: cygwin build failure |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-11-07 00:54:06 | Re: Proposal for Recover mode in pg_ctl (in 8.0) |