| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | andrew(at)pillette(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Using EXECUTE in same manner as SELECT |
| Date: | 2004-11-06 04:59:21 |
| Message-ID: | 418C5A29.5040207@samurai.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Andrew Lazarus wrote:
> Is there some clear reason why I can't using EXECUTE of a PREPAREd query
> as I can a SELECT statement in CREATE TABLE AS, INSERT, FROM clause,
> sub-selects, etc.? If not, wouldn't this be a very useful change?
You can already do CREATE TABLE AS ... EXECUTE.
I agree being able to use EXECUTE in more situations would be a good
thing. Patches are welcome.
I'm not sure there's a lot of value in adding support for EXECUTE in
subqueries, since you would still need to do parsing, rewriting and
planning for the rest of the query; also, the fact that the plan for the
EXECUTE has already been generated would limit the optimizer's ability
to pullup subqueries and so forth.
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-11-06 05:46:04 | Re: Converting number to words |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-11-06 04:36:31 | Re: Gborg down? |