From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | andrew(at)pillette(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Using EXECUTE in same manner as SELECT |
Date: | 2004-11-06 04:59:21 |
Message-ID: | 418C5A29.5040207@samurai.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Andrew Lazarus wrote:
> Is there some clear reason why I can't using EXECUTE of a PREPAREd query
> as I can a SELECT statement in CREATE TABLE AS, INSERT, FROM clause,
> sub-selects, etc.? If not, wouldn't this be a very useful change?
You can already do CREATE TABLE AS ... EXECUTE.
I agree being able to use EXECUTE in more situations would be a good
thing. Patches are welcome.
I'm not sure there's a lot of value in adding support for EXECUTE in
subqueries, since you would still need to do parsing, rewriting and
planning for the rest of the query; also, the fact that the plan for the
EXECUTE has already been generated would limit the optimizer's ability
to pullup subqueries and so forth.
-Neil
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-11-06 05:46:04 | Re: Converting number to words |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-11-06 04:36:31 | Re: Gborg down? |