From: | "Joolz" <joolz(at)arbodienst-limburg(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: change natural column order |
Date: | 2004-11-30 12:22:27 |
Message-ID: | 41857.10.0.4.254.1101817347.squirrel@webmail.arbodienst-limburg.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Richard Huxton zei:
> Joolz wrote:
>>
>>>I dont think the overhead in implementing such a rarely needed
>>>feature isnt worth it. We need a lot more other things ;-)
>>
>>
>> I agree. Only I think this wouldn't require new functionality, I
>> have a gut feeling that this is possible as it is. Now only find
>> out
>> how :)
>
> I think you'll find you're out of luck. IIRC there was some
> discussion
> on the hackers list regarding a mapping layer that would let you
> re-order columns. I think the decision was "too much work for too
> small
> a gain".
Got it:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-11/msg00869.php
> You have my sympathies, but you knew you weren't supposed to rely on
> the
> ordering.
Although I agree it sounds a bit weird, I saw someone mentioning
that column ordering is a part of ANSI-SQL.
Anyway, I'll have a look at attnum, see what it can do for me.
Thanks everyone!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-11-30 13:11:44 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] USENET vs Mailing Lists Poll ... |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-11-30 12:21:54 | Re: starting the database server |