| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jessica xingzc_he <xingzc_he(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: persistence of java objects |
| Date: | 2004-10-31 15:38:33 |
| Message-ID: | 418506F9.6010607@fastcrypt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi,
postgresql doesn't support this they way I suspect you are thinking of it.
How do other databases do this ?
dave
jessica xingzc_he wrote:
> hi,
>
> Does postgresql support this? if i want a column of a table for the
> persistence of instance of java objects, and use ResultSet.getObject()
> and ResultSet.updateObjecct() to access them. if so, what data type
> the column should be?
>
> thanks
> zhenchang
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
--
Dave Cramer
http://www.postgresintl.com
519 939 0336
ICQ#14675561
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ulrich Meis | 2004-10-31 20:29:57 | Re: persistence of java objects |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-10-31 02:17:02 | Re: PGobject overhaul (was Re: tightening up on use of oid |