| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Why is Gborg still listed? |
| Date: | 2004-10-30 16:19:13 |
| Message-ID: | 4183BF01.2090208@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Hello,
It was my understanding that Gborg is deprecated and that we are trying to
get people to move to the new infrastructure, specifically
Gforge/projects.postresql.org?
It seems that even more people are using Gborg now. I see:
PgOleDB
pl/Java
Slony
npgsql
All being fairly active projects on Gborg. Does it not stand to reason
to aggressively
pursue getting these projects to use the projects.postgresql.org site?
It may also help to stop advertising Gborg on the PostgreSQL.Org site
and start referencing
projects.postgresql.org instead.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 285 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-10-30 16:57:28 | Re: Why is Gborg still listed? |
| Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-10-30 16:15:12 | Re: New News Entry |